Criminal Defense of OWI / Operating While Under Influence/ Operating While Intoxicated / Drunk Driving
Focus on Intelligent Legal Representation
The Law Offices of Robert Nagel was established in 1993 and is located in Madison, Wisconsin. Our attorneys provide legal services to clients in Madison, Dane County, throughout Wisconsin and Illinois.
Attorney Robert Nagel wins OWI case at trial court, successfully challenging the "reasonable suspicion" of the traffic stop that resulted in the OWI charge. The trial court decision is upheld on appeal.
In a State of Wisconsin Court of Appeals ruling, the decision of the circuit court was upheld, dismissing an OWI charge for the client of criminal defense lawyer Robert Nagel, who successfully argued that the stop for driving under the influence (DUI) was unsupported by reasonable suspicion:
¶11 I likewise conclude that there were insufficient facts before Officer Schaefer which could lead him to reasonably suspect that Braun was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of an intoxicant. The question here is whether, considering the totality of the circumstances, Officer Schaefer could reasonably suspect that Braun was driving impaired. The only facts before Officer Schaefer indicating that Braun was driving impaired was the statement by the dispatcher that Braun was "intoxicated" and the statement by Sarah that Braun had been drinking.
¶12 The record does not indicate from whom the dispatcher received the information that Braun was intoxicated. The supreme court has held that anonymous tips, not suitably corroborated, do not exhibit " 'sufficient indicia of reliability to provide reasonable suspicion to make [an] investigatory stop.' " Florida v. J.L., 529 U.S. 266, 270 (2000) (citation omitted). As to Sarah's statement that Braun had been drinking, drinking and driving in and of itself is not a crime; there must be something more, for example, an indication of impairment or a prohibited alcohol concentration. Officer Schaefer did not observe Braun commit any traffic violations or criminal activity. What he did observe was Braun driving by the residence without stopping. While doing so may be unusual, I conclude that a reasonable inference of criminal activity, in particular, driving while intoxicated, cannot be drawn from that perfectly legal behavior. In short, the articulable facts, and the reasonable inferences which could be drawn from those facts, were insufficient to provide Officer Schaefer with reasonable suspicion to stop Braun's vehicle for driving while impaired. Accordingly, I conclude that suppression of evidence obtained from the stop of Braun's vehicle was proper.
Read the full Court of Appeals decision.
The Law Offices of Robert F. Nagel is a criminal defense law firm with attorneys experienced in plea negotiations, trials, appeals, and getting results. The lawyers are located in Madison, Wisconsin and serve criminal defendants in Dane County, Sauk County, Columbia County, Dodge County, Jefferson County, Rock County, Green County, Lafayette County, Iowa County, and Richland County, including the Wisconsin communties of Madison, Middleton, Monona, Fitchburg, Sun Prairie, Verona, Monroe, Darlington, Beaver Dam, Juneau, Waupun, Wisconsin Dells, Columbus, Portage, Richland Center, Sauk City, Baraboo, Dodgeville, Mineral Point, Janesville, and Beloit.